Thursday, December 3, 2015

Choosing Books


BETWEEN THE LINES
PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 01 December, 2015, 6:00am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 01 December, 2015, 6:00am

Hong Kong kids can benefit from reading quality books

Age-appropriate original tales will help build children’s literacy skills





Numerous studies point to the same finding that children who love to read grow up to be more astute, aware, compassionate, resourceful and resilient than those who don’t read for pleasure. Parents and teachers should pause and give thought to what they want to accomplish in getting children to read.
Finding joy and comfort in reading is not the same as having aptitude for language and reading comprehension. Once we embrace the idea that the goal is to develop a child’s passion for reading, and that strong literacy skills are just a necessary by-product, then the path to achieve it will be clear.
Parents and teachers play important roles in children’s reading journey, by modelling the reading habit and providing easy access to quality children’s books.
Children whose book diet consists only of popular mass fiction may not develop the stamina, comprehension and concentration needed to tackle reading assignments in middle school and high school. A strong foundation laid with quality books during each stage of a child’s early years is needed in order for them to appreciate English literature studies, especially when it comes to reading genres outside their area of interest.
Literacy blooms wherever students have access to books they want to read, permission to choose their own, and time to get lost in them
NANCIE ATWELL, INAUGURAL WINNER OF THE GLOBAL TEACHER PRIZE
Few children rush at the chance to read Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Don’t give seven- year-olds an abridged version of this masterpiece in dull prose. Instead, give them age-appropriate original tales for about a decade, to help build up their literacy skills. When they finally approach Macbethat age 17, they will appreciate Shakespeare’s language and context, and reap so much more from the experience.
Nancie Atwell, inaugural winner of the Global Teacher Prize and a champion for classroom libraries, states, “Literacy blooms wherever students have access to books they want to read, permission to choose their own, and time to get lost in them. Enticing collections of literature – interesting books written at levels they can decode with accuracy and comprehend with ease – are key to children becoming skilled, thoughtful, avid readers.”
When it comes to choosing books for children, the simple rule is the same for any sales position: know your customer. Your child may already show a preference for certain styles: the illustrations of Diary of a Wimpy Kid, the animal world of Geronimo Stilton, or factual compendia from DK Publishing.
Rather than steer a child away from their preferred genre, an enabling adult can introduce quality books from the same genre: illustrated novels such as Ottoline, animal tales like Babe the Gallant Pig, and illustrated biographies from Peter Sis, such as Starry Messenger, the story of astronomer Galileo. And then add a sprinkling of other books on a multitude of topics, ready for the child to explore at his own pace.
A teacher or librarian who can guide reading choices is an invaluable asset when on the hunt for quality children’s books. If you don’t have access to such a godsend, there is a myriad of print and online resources: book guides from Anita Silvey, Jim Trelease and other literacy experts; book lists and recommendations from public libraries around the world; and web-based literacy programmes like Guys Read for boys and A Mighty Girl for girls. Simply entering book preferences and queries for book suggestions in search engines can yield hundreds of search results to explore. And with the advent of complicated algorithms to determine customers’ shopping preferences, online bookshops can also provide good suggestions.
It is pointless having a child zip through scores of entertaining but unmemorable books, or check the box on classic literature he’s not ready for or not yet interested in. The best sign that you’ve chosen an appealing and inspiring book is a child whois excited enough to re-read parts or all of the tale that he has just finished, and then asks for more books like it.
Annie Ho is board chair of Bring Me A Book Hong Kong (bringmeabook.org.hk), a non-profit organisation advocating for family literacy


Tuesday, October 20, 2015

Feng Zikai Book Award Winners

How high-quality picture books can encourage kids to read more

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 20 October, 2015, 4:00am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 20 October, 2015, 4:00am


Annie Ho life@scmp.com




High-quality children's picture books are the building blocks to a lifelong love of reading. When I disparage commercial products in book form that are based on cartoon characters, my friends protest, insisting their children love storybook versions of their favourite animated TV series.
I counter that recognising and enjoying stories about familiar television characters is not the same as filling one's mind with the artful words and drawings of quality picture books. The difference is that children who are fed a diet of Peppa Pig and Henry Hugglemonster may one day no longer want reading time when they outgrow these characters.
What will keep children wanting to read more are stories that evoke emotions ranging from sheer joy to profound sadness, from belly-aching laughter to fear.
Max, the boy with the furry wolf suit in Where the Wild Things Are, may be just as recognisable as any cartoon character, but this picture book will be etched in the memories of every child who has come across it because of Maurice Sendak's choice narrative, flawless wording and visceral illustrations.
When children are exposed to quality picture books, they will inhale the rich language and complex themes, they will increase their understanding of the world around them, and their lives will be enriched as a result. They will progress from Ludwig Bemelmans' Madeline to Philip Stead's A Sick Day for Amos McGee. Thereafter, when they become independent readers, they will be able to enjoy Charlotte's Web as well as Captain Underpants.
Children's picture books in the English language have a long and revered history, but this is not the case for Chinese-language ones. Thus, the Feng Zikai Chinese Children's Picture Book Award was formed, in order to promote them in the Chinese language and encourage authors, illustrators and publishers to create quality picture books. The award has two components: a biennial award for the best Chinese publications, and an accompanying conference and forum to share and enhance knowledge and understanding of Chinese children's picture books.
The winner of the 4th Feng Zikai Chinese Children's Picture Book Award is Kata Kata Kata, written and illustrated by Bei Lynn. It is joined by four honour books. Interestingly, although all five books have different styles and storylines, I would describe them all as "poignant", touching upon the themes of love and longing. While some of the stories have amusing moments, their humour is approached with tenderness rather than comicality.
Next month, these winning authors and illustrators will be feted at an award ceremony, which will be followed by a two-day forum. The theme of the forum is "Just For Fun! - Humour in Picture Books", and the keynote speaker will be award-winning author and illustrator Jon Klassen.
I cannot think of anyone in a better position to speak about humour than Klassen, whose picture books have been described as subversive and "charmingly wicked". This is Not My Hat won Klassen both the Caldecott Medal in the US and the Kate Greenaway Medal in Great Britain, and he is the first person to win both awards for the same work.
Klassen will be in Hong Kong for an author talk and book signing on November 19. Registration and details at bringmeabook.org.hk For a complete list of Feng Zikai award-winning titles, visit fengzikaibookaward.org
Annie Ho is board chairwoman of Bring Me A Book Hong Kong

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Perspective

How to teach difference between words and thoughts (Inside Out helps)

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 22 September, 2015, 4:02am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 22 September, 2015, 4:02am






Animated feature films have come a long way since Walt Disney's 1937 Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. For films in the past two decades, the technical advances of animation are rivalled only by the increasing depth of storytelling.
Like many children and parents in Hong Kong and abroad, our family recently watched and loved the movie Inside Out. The plot is centred on an 11-year-old girl's move to a new city and school, and contains plenty of entertaining flashbacks. However, her anthropomorphic emotions are the stars of the show, and they are created with colours that sensibly match each of them well: red for Anger, green for Disgust, blue for Sadness, purple for Fear and yellow for Joy.
Despite Inside Out being my five-year-old daughter's second-ever movie experience, she managed to follow the storyline and even gain a better understanding of it than I expected. I was amused to hear her refer to the film when my elder one got testy about something. My daughter observed her big sister's bad temper and stated, "Oh, she's letting Anger take control at the front." Ironically, her big sister's takeaway from the film was apparently more superficial. For the past month, the only time she mentioned the film was when she asked to be dragged around our home by her ankles, just as Joy dragged around Sadness in the film.
This film is an ingenious way to help children learn that what one says is not necessarily a literal expression of what one is thinking or feeling, including they themselves. Understanding others' intentions, and feeling compassion and empathy for others as a result of such understanding, are both big milestones in a child's emotional development.
After seeing Inside Out, I couldn't help but compare it with Orit Gidali's picture book Nora the Mind Reader. A wonderfully inventive story that explains the nuances of communication to younger schoolchildren, it is translated from Gidali's original Hebrew, and is complemented by delightful mixed-media-collage illustrations.

When Nora comes home from school in an unhappy mood because a boy has called her "flamingo legs", her mother gives her a magic wand. Shaped like a bubble-blowing stick, the wand enables Nora to read people's minds when she peers through its circles. Nora takes the wand to school and begins to witness how thoughts and words can sometimes be very different.
For children in middle school to be aware of different perspectives, Rob Buyea tells an inspiring story with different narrators in Because of Mr Terupt. The new school year begins with the arrival of a new teacher, Mr Terupt. Seven of the fifth-graders in his class take turns narrating the story about this teacher's special ability to grasp the intentions behind these students' words and actions. These seven children have different backgrounds and distinct voices, which lend themselves to original storytelling when the plot thickens.
Stories help us learn about other people's lives. The bonus that comes with great children's literature is that such stories provide evocative language, vocabulary and descriptions, which we can then use when we want to express what is inside our head. When we convey our intentions and verbalise our thoughts in a clear and concise way, people who hear what we say or read what we write will understand us without confusion or frustration on either end. Ultimately, that's what most of us want from life: to be understood by others, and to make connections with others.
Annie Ho is board chair of Bring Me a Book Hong Kong bringmeabook.org.hk a non-profit organisation advocating family literacy


Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Transitional Readers

YOUNG READERS CAN WAIT FOR CLASSICS

Parents make a mistake by giving their children classic books to read when they are too young to deal with the subject matter
PUBLISHED : Monday, 24 August, 2015, 10:27pm
UPDATED : Monday, 24 August, 2015, 10:27pm



Harper Lee's Go Set a Watchman has been flying off the shelves of bookshops and libraries around the world, and I wonder whether the copies being sold in Hong Kong should include a label to say that it is not suitable for children under 12. You may think that I'm being facetious, but I have seen a first-grader reading Lee's first book, To Kill a Mockingbird. Clearly not a book he chose for himself, it turned out his parents had encouraged him to read the work because "it is a classic". Had they read the book themselves (which they hadn't), these parents would understand that a story centred on a rape trial is highly inappropriate material for young children, regardless of how strong an independent reader he is.
Our fixation on introducing children to "classics" at a young age may just be another manifestation of hyper-parenting and the need to give children a head start on things including phonics at age two to violin at age three. Or perhaps we've overlooked the value of reading classic literature and are merely focused on "ticking the box" in the same way that we spend our family holiday in California trying to visit as many theme parks as possible.
Children in early primary years are just beginning to appreciate the power of the written language. Now that they are capable of reading for content, it's time to excite them with wondrous words and sentences that help them grasp intentions, moods and context. When reading on their own, children at this stage have progressed beyond Dr Seuss, but are not quite ready for E.B. White and Roald Dahl.
There are some good publications available for transitional readers, the industry's term for children who are graduating from beginning readers to chapter books. They include Passport to Reading, which publishes Ling & Ting, Grace Lin's droll series about a pair of twins; Green Light Readers, which publishes Tim Egan's wacky Dodsworthseries; and Walker Stories, which publishes Mary Murphy's lovely Parrot Parkseries.
My only gripe with the above books is that, although well-written and enjoyable, they are not stories that children are inclined to read more than once. Here is a selection of stories for first- and second-graders that - like those stories from classic literature - can be savoured, remembered and revisited.
Dick King-Smith writes wonderfully imaginative animal adventures, his best-known being Babe, the Gallant Pig. A shorter but equally entertaining read is All Because of Jackson, a tale about a rabbit who longs to sail around the world.
Jill Tomlinson is the author of The Owl Who Was Not Afraid of the Dark and other stories from her Favourite Animal Tales series. I admire Tomlinson for writing animal tales that have their own distinct flavour and do not follow any formula.
For beautiful stories about resilience and embracing life, Swedish duo Rose Lagercrantz and Eva Eriksson have written and illustrated a series about a little girl named Dani, beginning with the first book, My Happy Life.
Cynthia Rylant's Cobble Street Cousins series is perfect for children who are most likely to grow up loving gentle fare such as Louisa May Alcott's Little Women.
Children who couldn't get enough of Mo Willems' Elephant and Piggiebooks when they were in kindergarten will happily transition to Judith Viorst's Lulu series. Flouting convention, the author speaks directly to the reader in side-splitting "time-outs" between chapters. Similarly, Kate DiCamillo's Bink and Gollie series will induce guffaws from readers who can keep up with the advanced vocabulary contained in the brief but witty text.
Parents who still have lingering worries that their children will be missing out on "the classics" simply must remind themselves that children have their whole lives to read Harper Lee and Charles Dickens, but now is their only time to enjoy Dick King-Smith or Kate DiCamillo.


Annie Ho is board chairwoman of Bring Me a Book Hong Kong bringmeabook.org.hk a non-profit promoting family literacy


Friday, July 3, 2015

Alfie Kohn


It's 2:00 a.m. and I just finished reading the Introduction and Chapter One to Alfie Kohn's Unconditional Parenting. Even though I'm only 5% of the way through the book, I've already highlighted about 75% of the text there. Kohn has artfully communicated (and provided ample research evidence for) what I believe deep down but have not been able to fully attempt in my own parenting style because (1) I received conditional parenting, and (2) I've been deeply conditioned by my environment to focus on producing well-behaved and cooperative children.

From the publisher:


Most parenting guides begin with the question “How can we get kids to do what they're told?” and then proceed to offer various techniques for controlling them. In this truly groundbreaking book, nationally respected educator Alfie Kohn begins instead by asking, “What do kids need—and how can we meet those needs?” What follows from that question are ideas for working with children rather than doing things to them.

More than just another book about discipline, though, Unconditional Parenting addresses the ways parents think about, feel about, and act with their children. It invites them to question their most basic assumptions about raising kids while offering a wealth of practical strategies for shifting from “doing to” to “working with” parenting—including how to replace praise with the unconditional support that children need to grow into healthy, caring, responsible people. This is an eye-opening, paradigm-shattering book that will reconnect readers to their own best instincts and inspire them to become better parents.

From my own notes:

Kohn is so right. I own and have read so many books about parenting, ranging from how to sleep train babies, how to talk so kids will listen, how to set boundaries... and it's all about modifying the behavior of the child so that parents can feel a sense of control (and sanity). 

As parents, we are fixated on immediate compliance and what we demand from our children, rather than considering what our children need and seeing the whole child rather than the behavior.

Our love for our children is conditional upon their good behavior, or achievement in academics, sports or other talents/skills. A quote from the book: "It's possible to love our children passionately, but not in the way they need to be loved." It doesn’t matter how much we love them, it’s HOW we love them.

We all protest, "Of course we love our children no matter what, we love them unconditionally."

Well, here are some of the beliefs held by those who use conditional parenting to raise their children. Do any of these ring a bell? 

-  If children misbehave or do poorly on a test, then they need to be punished. 
-  Rewarding them under such circumstances will only lead to them misbehaving more or continuing to do poorly on tests. 
-  If kids misbehave or don't do as they're told, we must not hug and show affection towards them, we must not give them ice-cream, we must not read them a bedtime story... we will withhold love from them. 

What lesson does the child learn from this? What kind of person will this child become? 

When we expend all our efforts giving top priority to short-term obedience and super-kid achievement, what are the long-term implications? 

Most parents, when asked what long-term goals they have for their children, answer that they want their children to be happy, balanced, independent, fulfilled, productive, kind, thoughtful, loving, inquisitive, and confident. Do our daily actions toward our children encourage them to become all these adjectives we hope to ascribe to them one day?

We are most proud of our children when they get good grades, win competitions, behave the way we want them to behave. A "good" child is one who is polite, quiet and not much trouble to us grown-ups. Is that our dream for our children, that they grow up to be "not much trouble"? If the answer is "no", then why do we behave and act in our daily interactions with our children as though quiet and well-behaved ARE the ONLY goals we have for them?

To all my friends raising children, and especially those whose children attend local Hong Kong schools with a very traditional system of rewards and metrics-based testing: please read this mind-blowing book NOW. 

(Book also translated into Chinese.)

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

CCC

Two books that teach children how to help others

Authors help children to see a way of life and financial circumstance that is completely different from their own
PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 30 June, 2015, 6:03am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 30 June, 2015, 6:03am






Every one of us starts life as an egocentric baby, concerned only with having our own needs fulfilled. Somewhere along the road to adulthood, we all become less self-centred, to varying degrees. Some children are so protected from growing pains that they never let go of their self-centredness. Others grow up in an environment that lets them become empathetic and aware of others' feelings.
I was fortunate to have parents who valued volunteerism and community. As far as they could, they lived each day, putting the needs of others ahead of their own. This included participating in micro-loans to help friends through difficulties. Hui are loan clubs entrenched in Chinese society and extensively relied upon by the Chinese diaspora. My parents never turned down an invitation to join a loan club. With nothing more than a handshake, it was a win-win proposition that relied on mutual trust. My parents understood that, for the initiators of the loan clubs, the effect of this pooled support ranged from convenience to life-changing impact.
Katie Smith Milway explores its life-changing aspect in One Hen: How One Small Loan Made a Big Difference. Part of the CitizenKid series of books, which uses fiction and non-fiction stories to inform and inspire children as global citizens, One Hen is about a boy whose mother receives a small loan from some village families after his father dies. The boy uses some of the money to buy one hen; it grows to 25 hens by the end of one year, and eventually becomes the largest poultry farm in Ghana.
I appreciate the idea of teaching people to help themselves. It seems to provide more sustainable outcomes than simply giving hand-outs.
As a result, I spend most of my free time volunteering with two local non-profit organisations that focus on training, including Bring Me A Book Hong Kong. Besides donating picture books, it focuses on training parents and teachers on the art and science of reading aloud to children.
Beatrice's Goat, a picture book by Page McBrier, tells the story of an impoverished family that was taught to help itself. Beatrice's family was given a goat by Heifer Project International, a non-profit organisation that seeks to end global hunger by providing livestock to poor communities around the world. The titular goat provides enough milk to feed Beatrice and her five siblings, with a surplus to sell for profit. In the end, Beatrice's dream to be a schoolgirl comes true.
These two books help children to see a way of life and financial circumstance that is completely different from their own. It's inspiring to know that, in the developing world, one simple hen or goat can bring about such change to a family and its community.
To build tolerance and compassion in children, parents can expose them to other families and societies. We read with horror news stories about rural farmers who sell their own daughters to support their families. Until you understand the abject poverty that they are fighting to overcome, you cannot feel compassion for such families. And when you feel compassion for them, you will be motivated to help them.
To help children find their own "something", Ellen Sabin's The Giving Book is an interactive tool that "helps them record their ideas, dreams and wishes for the world - making them the authors of their stories and creating a 'scrapbook' of their journey into compassion, philanthropy and the power of their actions."
Families who want to learn more about local children-related charities can visit the Children Charities Carnival on Sunday, from noon to 5pm at Dream Kids Club in Chai Wan. Visit their Facebook page or email ccc@prestique.com for more details.
Annie Ho is board chairwoman of Bring Me A Book Hong Kong, a non-profit organisation promoting family literacy

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Boundaries with Kids

Parents need to agree about how to raise children. Here's a book that helps

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 02 June, 2015, 6:48am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 02 June, 2015, 6:48am




My husband and I never argued until our children came along. At first, we blamed the kids. Then we blamed the stress of parenting, both external and self-imposed. And finally, we began to see that our differences stemmed from the way we were brought up.
It hadn't occurred to us we had any cultural differences because we are both ethnic Chinese. However, he was raised in Hong Kong and I grew up in Canada. The big picture is the same for all parents: to raise their children to become happy, loving and responsible adults. Where many of us differ from our co-parent is the means to that end.
I was enlightened by Drs Henry Cloud and John Townsend's Boundaries with Kids, and immediately shared my heavily highlighted copy with my husband.
An important lesson that is best taught early on is self-discipline. Rather than labelling children as naughty or nice, we need only consider whether they have self-discipline or not. Today's children are not provided with the opportunities to learn self-discipline because parents have a fear of seeing their children suffering, displeased or unhappy.
In the 19th century, the notion that parents existed for the sake of their children was unheard of. Our child-centric family culture has taken form only in recent decades. Children and their feelings were neglected, or at least considered to be not worthy of concern, well into the 1960s. Although she might be deemed an incompetent mother by today's standards, Betty Francis (the former Mrs Draper) in the television series Mad Men was probably typical of her era.
I'm not suggesting that we regress to Victorian child-rearing practices; a child's mental and psychological well-being should be held in the same regard as his physical well-being. Cloud and Townsend state parents do need to empathise with their children's feelings. However, they are unable to delay their children's gratification because they "over-identify" with their children's pain, fear and loneliness.
The authors suggest: "Some parents confuse their own painful feelings with their child's, thinking that the child is in more trouble than he actually is. What might be discomfort for the toddler is seen as trauma by the mother; what may be anxiety for the teen is experienced as panic by the father."
As parents, we need to distinguish between hurt and harm. When a child cries because his parents are leaving him at home to go out to dinner, he is unhappy about being left behind. Some parents may cancel dinner and stay home, believing that doing so will help the child to feel safe and happy.
Before making the decision to stay or go, parents need to ask themselves whether leaving their well-loved child in a safe environment under these circumstances is harming the child, or merely hurting the child. Hurt doesn't have long-term implications and is necessary for a child to grow and develop.
On the other hand, parents should try their best to not only protect their child from harm, but also ensure they are not the ones inflicting that harm on their child. There is no harm in having a child experience separation from his parents while they spend a few hours dining at a restaurant. And parents need to willingly allow their child to be occasionally hurt.
Cloud and Townsend explain when a well-loved child cries in protest about his parents going out without him, "his tears are not the wounds of an unloved person, but the normal grief of a [child] who needs to learn to handle mum's absences".
After reading and discussing Boundaries with Kids, my husband and I were able to agree on a plan for developing a consistent style for raising our children together. This book helped us understand each other's parenting styles and enabled us to see how the way we were raised greatly informed the kind of parent we've become.
Annie Ho is board chairwoman of Bring Me A Book Hong Kong bringmeabook.org.hk a non-profit organisation advocating for family literacy

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Paris

Five children's books about Paris that inspire Hong Kong family to visit

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 05 May, 2015, 6:00am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 05 May, 2015, 11:06am






Last month, my husband and I started brainstorming our next holiday while we were, funnily enough, on holiday. We considered Amsterdam, Prague and cities in Spain or Italy. And then our eyes lit up at the idea of going back to Paris, the destination of our first trip together. I admit that, while he was envisioning this romantic getaway for the two of us, I fantasised about bringing our daughters along to discover the famous landmarks and many attractions for families.
My fantasy is undoubtedly fuelled by our well-read copies of Madeline and Adele & Simon. The story of a red-headed seven-year-old girl living in a boarding school in Paris, Ludwig Bemelmans' Madeline has been read aloud in our home dozens of times. We love the rhyme and rhythm of the text, and have spent so much time poring over interesting details of pre-second world war life. There is a doctor who makes house calls, and then proceeds to call for an ambulance by instructing a telephone operator to connect him to "Danton-Ten-Six". At the hospital, Madeline convalesces in a bed that is adjustable using a manual bed crank.
Barbara McClintock's Adele & Simon is equally charming and nostalgic for life in a different era. The story starts with Adele collecting her younger brother Simon after school. On the way home, the two children make detours through many iconic scenes of early 19th century Paris: a street market, city garden, museum, Latin Quarter enclave and a tea salon. At each stop, Simon absented-mindedly leaves behind his hat, scarf, school bag, coat… until he arrives home with nothing but the shirt on his back.
For this column, I wanted to compare these two books, and was curious to find out which book had been written first. When I saw that McClintock's book was published in 2006, more than six decades after Bemelmans published Madeline, I did a double-take, then made sure it wasn't the date of reprinting. What a pleasant surprise to learn that McClintock is a contemporary illustrator who enjoys creating picture books that evoke a past world.
Her story is also a pleasant surprise. She left her childhood home in North Dakota and moved to New York after cold-calling Maurice Sendak to ask about how to become a children's book illustrator. He took the time to chat with her on the phone, advising her how to put together a portfolio and recommending that she move to New York.
There are other wonderful picture books about the City of Light. A Giraffe Goes to Paris is Mary Tavener Holmes' account of the true story of Belle the giraffe. She was a gift from the pasha of Egypt to King Charles X of France, and, in 1827, she sailed from Alexandria to Marseilles, and then took more than one month to walk the 800km to Paris. Old maps, photographs and portraits supplement Jon Cannell's illustrations.
Emily Arnold McCully's beautifully illustrated Mirette on the High Wire won the 1993 Caldecott Medal. It is an inspiring story about courage and perseverance. Mirette is a feisty and fearless little girl who, through her determination to learn to walk a tightrope, helps a retired tightrope walker to overcome his fear.
For beginning readers, Dodsworth in Paris is about comic foil Dodsworth and a mischievous duck. The simple, succint sentences present a hilarious story and the expressive illustrations will have children and adults laughing aloud at the silly antics of the troublemaking duck.
The wonderful thing about all of the above books is that each is part of a series, so you can enjoy books with the same premise or characters, in a new city or adventure.
Annie Ho is board chair of Bring Me A Book Hong Kong bringmeabook.org.hk a non-profit organisation advocating for family literacy.


Saturday, April 11, 2015

Remembering to Play

Why unsupervised play benefits children

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 07 April, 2015, 6:03am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 07 April, 2015, 2:18pm





"Play is the most efficient driver of learning for children. This is as true of their cognitive development as their physical and emotional development." These statements introduce a chapter on remembering to play in Teach Your Children Well, by child psychologist Dr Madeline Levine.
She outlines the concept through a "time wheel": a pie-chart of a child's 24-hour day. There are fixed wedges of time each day for school, homework, meals and sleep. Whatever is left over is that "sliver of time" which is at the discretion of parents. We should fill up that sliver with fun activities, right? Wrong.
She argues that any activity that corrects, criticises or judges a child's behaviour is stressful and not fun. Splashing around in the pool is not the same as going to swim class where a coach is telling the child to swim faster or learn new skills. When a child is expected to be on their best behaviour for most activities on the time wheel, that sliver of free time had better truly be free.
Dr Levine writes: "We all know that some of our best work is done when no one is watching, when we feel free to be flexible and creative. Make sure your child has time to explore and create and learn without the pressure of constant scrutiny and evaluation."
Naturally there are children who love to have every hour of their day filled with stimulating activities. There are also children who love to have French fries and chocolate bars with every meal. Ultimately, parents have the final say as what to put into that sliver on the time wheel.
Dr Levine cites the example of two boys chasing each other around the playground during recess. "While this may look simply like a good way to burn off energy and calories - which is enough to recommend it - it is also a highly sophisticated social transaction. In order for the game to continue, each boy has to be willing to be both the chaser and the chased … This ability to play reciprocally is a powerful predictor of academic success, as is the ability to empathise and cooperate."
I remind myself that not every moment of a child's day needs to be educative, and try to let my children enjoy activities that are non-judgmental and not specifically focused on building skills. For my children, this means playing with sofa cushions and random household objects. It also means enjoying read-aloud time with books that are beautifully created but have with little educative value.
It's Useful to Have a Duck is a flip book by Isol, a children's picture book creator from Argentina and recipient of the prestigious Astrid Lindgren Memorial Award. After reading what the boy thinks about his duck, simply flip the book to enjoy mirrored illustrations from the duck's perspective.
Canadian author Sara O'Leary has created a charming series, The Henry Books, beginning with When You Were Small. It is filled with whimsical replies, artfully illustrated, to a young boy's request to his father, "Tell me about when I was small".
Supposing… by Alastair Reid is a seemingly straightforward book setting out a child-like supposition on every page: "Supposing I had a twin brother but we never told anyone and only went to school half the time each ..."
Reid wrote the text in 1960, and acclaimed illustrator Bob Gill recently added new illustrations to create a masterpiece that can spark the imagination of young readers when they come up with their own scenarios.
Ideally, they would be writing and illustrating their own scenarios during unstructured playtime.
Annie Ho is board chair of Bring Me A Book Hong Kong (bringmeabook.org.hk), a leading advocate for family literacy

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Madeline Levine

Psychologist and best-selling author Dr. Madeline Levine gave a talk on March 11, 2015 in Hong Kong on “The Price of Privilege”. After reading her book, hearing her speak twice and spending an afternoon touring around Hong Kong with her and her family, I got a little more sense of her message and want to share my thoughts on how her message will translate into how my own children will be raised. I hope this will be helpful to friends who are also pondering, and rising up to, the challenge of raising children in Hong Kong.


FREAKING OUT ABOUT SCHOOLS

Mothers crying when their 2 year-old children do not get into their first-choice nursery/kindergarten is a good indication of the current state of parental investment in their children’s lives.

Dr. Levine made a humorous comment, saying that the audience should accept that their children are “average”, and that the best way for their children to get into Harvard would be legacy, sports or arts scholarship, or significant donation. She joked that parents should be aware that sending their teenage children to Africa to build water treatment plants “was not going to get their kid into Harvard”.

The question is not: “If water treatment plants won’t help, then what will help get my kid into Harvard?”

Rather, parents should be asking themselves: “What kind of kid would I rather have at age 30: (1) a kid who went to Harvard but learned nothing, feels and acts with a great sense of entitlement, and is unsuccessful with work and personal relationships, or (2) a kid who enjoyed his college experience, learned a lot, made real friends, found his authentic self and truly appreciates his life?”

Of course, there will be children who thrive under “the chosen path”: getting straight A’s at the right schools that allow them to get into their first-choice college. But there is a much larger percentage of children who will end up as great kids that parents may not necessary be bragging about in terms of grades, first-place prizes and other metrics. Dr. Levine’s point is that, having a child who falls into option (2) may not be a bad thing. 

Dr. Levine states, “Parents need to truthfully separate their own desires from the desires of their children.”

Yes, most everyone will logically accept the previous statement, but how does this apply to your five year-old child? Who the hell knows what he desires, least of all himself?!?

My personal view is, go ahead and freak out about kindergarten. Everyone else is doing it, so unless you live in a bubble and absolutely don’t care about your child’s school path, you should be doing all you can get your child into your/his first-choice school. Because the best kindergarten will feed into the best primary school, which will help ensure the best way to secondary school or boarding school, which will feed into the best college. We are a generation of hands-on parents, and if we don’t expend at least the same amount of energy as other parents, we will be doing our child a disservice. 

BUT, please freak out without letting your kid know that you’re freaking out. Please don’t judge your child on what kindergarten/primary school he gets into or not.  Please don’t judge your child only on his achievements.  Things I have said in the past that I will try very hard not to repeat in the future:

“You got 100% on your dictation test, you’re so clever, mummy is so proud of you!”

“You got first place in that competition, that’s so awesome. You’re such a champ!”

The reasoning is, unless you have a consistently high-performing child, statements like the above will have kids who don’t achieve in future tests/competitions thinking, “Oh, mummy isn’t proud of me, and I’m not awesome because I didn’t come first.”

Dr. Levine asked the group of 600 parents at the talk: “Raise your hand if your life has gone completely according to plan.” And 30 people (5% of the audience) raised their hand.

She continued, “Raise your hand if you have NEVER experienced a divorce, death in the family, financial reversal or other serious hardship or setback in life.” And no one raised a hand.

There is so much more to life than academic achievement. There is so much more to life than brand-name school. You need to consciously make your children believe this is the case.

“Children need to see that we value their character first, their effort second, and then their grades.”

The best parents are not those who find the best tutors and extra-curricular activities for their children. The best parents are those who help their children develop a resiliency to face setbacks. Sure, everything is awesome when your child comes in first place, and mummy & daddy are so proud that they’re sharing this achievement all over social media. But how will your child cope when life throws a curve ball? Because life is not perfect, and that curve ball will come sooner or later, at age 10 or 30 or 50. How will he handle it then?

Dr. Levine found it incredulous that, when she advised that parents should not focus too much on school grades, a Hong Kong parent asked her, “But how will I know that I’m being a good parent if not from my child’s grades?” (Really?!? That's how parents measure their own success as parents!?!)

She reminded us of the US Department of Labor forecast that, by the time today's grade-school children grow up, 65% of them will be in jobs that don’t even exist today (e.g. avatar design consultant, digital death manager, online community curator). The traditional education system only focuses on hard skills like memorizing facts about English grammar, mathematical concepts and social studies trivia. Parents (and hopefully educators too) need to turn their efforts to preparing children to solve problems and learn skills for jobs that they have never seen before.

The best way to equip children for the future is to nurture non-academic skills, such as creativity, problem-solving, resilience and “grit”. According to Dr. Levine, ways for parents to nurture these skills include: allotting “free time” into children’s daily schedule, making sure children have more than enough sleep, letting children make mistakes and fail, and connecting with children through reading aloud.


BUT MY KID LOVES SPORTS

Before Dr. Levine, my view on extra-curricular activities was that academic tutoring was bad, but “fun stuff” was good.  I signed my kids up for swimming, tennis, art, tap-dancing and singing. And I haughtily tut-tutted at parents who filled their children’s schedule with phonics, Kumon maths and Chinese tutorials.

Dr. Levine talks about “the time wheel”. When we do a pie-chart of our child’s 24-hour day, we acknowledge that there are allotted hours which are non-negotiable: school, homework, meals and sleep. Whatever is left over is that “sliver of time” that is at the discretion of parents. 

We should go ahead and schedule that sliver of time with something fun, right? Wrong.

Dr. Levine argues that anything that corrects/criticizes/judges a child’s behavior is stressful and not fun. Splashing around in the pool is not the same as a swim class where the coach is telling your child to swim faster, learn new skills, or swim in the assigned stroke style. When a child is expected to be on best behavior for most activities on the time wheel, that sliver of free time had better truly be free. 

That sliver of free time should be left to an activity that is non-judgmental and not specifically focused on skills-building. Allow your child to hear you read-aloud a story, freely play with Lego/Playdoh, do silly things with sofa cushions/skipping rope/household objects, or simply just be bored. 

“Eat quickly!” “Don’t dawdle!” “Do it this way!” “Don’t do it that way!” “Now try it again!”

Isn’t it sad and stifling that, other than when they are asleep, over-scheduled children are constantly told to correct or improve his actions or behavior? Not every minute of a child’s life needs to be an educative opportunity. 

“We all know that some of our best work is done when no one is watching, when we feel free to be flexible and creative. Make sure your child has time to explore and create and learn without the pressure of constant scrutiny and the threat of constant evaluation.”

Yes there are many kids who love to have every hour of their day filled with stimulating activities. There are also kids who love to eat French fries and chocolate bars for every meal and snack. Parents have the final say in what their children eat as well as what to put in that sliver of time on the time wheel.


BUT MY KID ISN’T SLEEPY

Dr. Levine puts a great deal of emphasis on the importance of having enough sleep, which means 10-11 hours for children under the age of 12, and 9-10 hours for teenagers. 

Mummy friends think it’s incredulous that my seven year-old child normally falls asleep at 7:30pm (dinner at 5:30pm, into bed around 7:00pm, asleep by 7:30pm and waking on her own 11 hours later). While such an early bedtime for a seven year-old is the norm in North America, it’s rare in the Hong Kong local school system.

There's no magic to getting my kid into bed at 7:00pm. It’s what I put as number one priority and I work very hard to make it happen in our home. I have friends who insist, “My kindergartener is fine sleeping from 10:00pm to 7:00pm”, “I cut my 3 year-old’s afternoon nap so that she will sleep better at night”, “My kid isn’t tired until at least 10:00pm.”

Yes, I agree that different children have different sleeping needs. But there are two kinds of kids who sleep at 10:00pm. There is the child who is put down with bedtime story and lights out at 8:00pm but takes a long time to wind down and fall asleep. And then there is the child who has extra-curricular activities until 8:00pm and homework until 9:30pm. 

Dr. Levine believes it is important to schedule in the adequate amount of sleep time for children because, in the long term, having an edge in maths or excelling in that second musical instrument or third sport is not going to produce a happy teenager (or get your kid into college!). Adequate sleep allows for memory consolidation, neural processing of knowledge and information, and ability to cope and think out of the box.


INTRUSION VS SUPPORT

Well-intentioned parents provide their children with every opportunity possible, and devote large amounts of time to being involved in their school and extra-curricular life. And yet, no research study has been able to show a positive correlation between well-adjusted children and the amount of time their parents spend with them. It’s quality versus quantity. 

Some words of wisdom from Dr. Levine in this regard:

“Intrusion and support are two fundamentally different processes: support is about the needs of the child, intrusion is about the needs of the parent… We have to be acutely attuned to our own psychological issues and our own happiness, or lack of it. We have to be willing to take an unflinching look at our parenting skills.”

“We need to examine our parenting paradigm. Raising children has come to look more and more like a business endeavor and less and less like an endeavor of the heart. We are overly concerned with how our children “do” rather than who our children “are”. We pour time, attention, money into insuring their performance, consistently making it to their soccer game while inconsistently making it to the dinner table. The fact that our persistent and often critical involvement is well-intended, that we believe that our efforts ultimately will help our children to be happy and to successfully compete in a demanding world, does not lessen the damage.”

“We can be overinvolved in the wrong things, and underinvolved in the right things, both at the same time.”


TYING IT ALL BACK TO READING TOGETHER

Can something so simple and straightforward as reading aloud with children (from babies to teenagers) really address the challenges of parenting and raising good kids? YES!

A quality picture-book (including illustrated, read-aloud versions of chapter books) will give both parent and child a perspective outside of their everyday existence. 

“Help your child develop compensatory strategies for things that are hard for them. Remember that development is still very uneven, and the child who has trouble stringing a sentence together at age eight may be on the debate team in high school. Parents need to help their child maintain a sense of perspective and not cut off interests prematurely.”

Reading aloud stories such as The Little Engine That Could and Leo the Late Bloomer will teach your child perseverance and give you perspective about your child’s pace of developing abilities. 

“Too often with our children, we rush in and offer suggestions, propose alternatives, or solve problems. While well-intentioned, this kind of premature cutting off of communication is often a result of our anxiety about letting our children struggle.”  

It’s natural for parents to want to protect their child from disappointment, shame, failure. So the natural reaction is to step in when we see our child heading towards a course of action that will lead to getting emotionally hurt. We need to go against this natural instinct and consciously stop ourselves from “helping” our child. 

Amy Krouse Rosenthal’s Spoon is a wonderful story for children to learn about self-acceptance. And the bonus is that it is also an awesome example for parents to learn about supportive and non-intrusive parenting, with Mommy Spoon in the background, adeptly handling her child’s complaining and discontent. Sometimes, all your child needs is someone to understand and support him, not someone to fix problems for him or protect him from experiencing bad emotions.

[The insightful comments about the mother in Spoon were shared with me by master reading specialist Julie Fowlkes.]

[click on below images to enlarge]






“Our children benefit more from our ability to be ‘present’ than they do from being rushed off to one more activity. Try to slow down. It is almost always in quiet, unpressured moments that kids reach inside and expose the most delicate parts of their developing selves.”

The more children read, the wider their vocabulary, the faster they think, the better grasp of language learned in an organic way. Yes, improved literacy is a wonderful by-product of reading together.

But reading together is ultimately about parent-child bonding and a lifelong love of learning. Learning about the world, and learning about each other. Through storytime, and conversations that you and your child have about those stories, you will have a deeper understanding of your child.

And if you truly understand your child, you will not need to wait until he exhibits signs of stress or distress to realize that he needs help. You will be able to provide support in the individual way that you know your particular child responds well to. When the parent-child bond is healthy, and both enjoy reading together, I can bet that chances are that we and our children will enjoy each other’s company more, and also that we will have less of those “I’m such a bad parent!” days.